Abstract
In the present paper, we develop a general mathematical framework for discrimination between \(r\geq2\) quantum states by \(N\geq1\) sequential receivers for the case in which every receiver obtains a conclusive result. This type of discrimination constitutes an \(N\)-sequential extension of the minimum-error discrimination by one receiver. The developed general framework, which is valid for a conclusive discrimination between any number \(r\geq2\) of quantum states, pure or mixed, of an arbitrary dimension and any number \(N\geq1\) of sequential receivers, is based on the notion of a quantum state instrument, and this allows us to derive new important general results. In particular, we find a general condition on \(r\geq2\) quantum states under which, within the strategy in which all types of receivers’ quantum measurements are allowed, the optimal success probability of the \(N\)-sequential conclusive discrimination between these \(r\geq2\) states is equal to that of the first receiver for any number \(N\geq2\) of further sequential receivers and specify the corresponding optimal protocol. Furthermore, we extend our general framework to include an \(N\)-sequential conclusive discrimination between \(r\geq2\) arbitrary quantum states under a noisy communication. As an example, we analyze analytically and numerically a two-sequential conclusive discrimination between two qubit states via depolarizing quantum channels. The derived new general results are important both from the theoretical point of view and for the development of a successful multipartite quantum communication via noisy quantum channels.
Notes
For the constraint used in [13] on receivers’ quantum measurements, see Section 2 of that paper.
This is, for example, the case in [13], where the receivers’ quantum measurements are described by specific quantum instruments.
One and the same POV measure may correspond to different quantum state instruments, see Section 2.
See the representation (6).
See Section 2.
References
C. W. Helstrom, Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory, Academic Press, 1976.
A. S. Holevo, Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory, North-Holland, 1979.
J. A. Bergou, E. Feldman, and M. Hillery, “Extracting Information from a Qubit by Multiple Observers: Toward a Theory of Sequential State Discrimination”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111 (2013), 100501.
C.-Q. Pang, F.-L Zhang, L.-F. Xu, M.-L. Liang, and J.-L. Chen, “Sequential State Discrimination and Requirement of Quantum Dissonance”, Phys. Rev. A, 88 (2013), 052331.
J.-H. Zhang, F.-L. Zhang, and M.-L. Liang, “Sequential State Discrimination with Quantum Correlation”, Quantum. Inf. Proces., 17 (2018), 260.
M. Namkung and Y. Kwon, “Optimal Sequential State Discrimination between Two Mixed Quantum States”, Phys. Rev. A, 96 (2017), 022318.
M. Namkung and Y. Kwon, “Analysis of Optimal Sequential State Discrimination for Linearly Independent Pure Quantum States”, Sci. Rep., 8 (2018), 6515.
M. Hillery and J. Mimih, “Sequential Discrimination of Qudits by Multiple Receivers”, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 50 (2017), 435301.
M. Namkung and Y. Kwon, “Generalized Sequential State Discrimination for Multiparty QKD and Its Optical Implementation”, Sci. Rep., 10 (2020), 8247.
M. A. Solis-Prosser, P. Gonzalez, J. Fuenzalida, S. Gomez, G. B. Xavier, A. Delgado, and G. Lima, “Experimental Multiparty Sequential State Discrimination”, Phys. Rev. A, 94 (2016), 042309.
M. Namkung and Y. Kwon, “Sequential State Discrimination of Coherent States”, Sci. Rep., 8 (2018), 16915.
T. Rudolph, R. W. Spekkens, and P. S. Turner, “Unambiguous Discrimination of Mixed States”, Phys. Rev. A, 68 (2003), 010301(R).
D. Fields, A. Varga, and J. A. Bergou, Sequential Measurements on Qubits by Multiple Observers: Joint Best Guess Strategy, IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 2020.
E. B. Davies, Quantum Theory of Open Systems, Academic Press, 1976.
P. Busch, M. Grabowski, and P. J. Lahti, Operational Quantum Physics, Springer, 1995.
A. S. Holevo, Statistical Structure of Quantum Theory, Springer, Berlin, 2001.
E. R. Loubenets, “Quantum Stochastic Approach to the Description of Quantum Measurements”, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 34 (2001), 7639–7675.
O. E. Barndoff-Nielson and E. R. Loubenets, “General Framework for the Behaviour of Continuously Observed Open Quantum Systems”, J. Phys. A, 35 (2002), 565–588.
M. E. Shirokov, “Entropy Reduction of Quantum Measurements”, J. Math. Phys., 52 (2011), 052202.
M. E. Shirokov, “On Properties of the Space of Quantum States and Their Application to the Construction of Entanglement Monotones”, Izv. Math., 74:4 (2010), 849–882.
K. Kraus, States, Effects, and Operations: Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory, Springer, 1983.
M. Ozawa, “Quantum Measuring Processes of Continuous Observables”, J. Math. Phys., 25 (1984), 79.
E. R. Loubenets, “General Lower and Upper Bounds under Minimum-Error Quantum State Discrimination”, Phys. Rev. A., 105 (2022), 032410.
Funding
The study by E.R. Loubenets in Section 2, Section 3, and Section 4.1 of this work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation under grant No 19-11-00086 and performed at the Steklov Mathematical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences. The study by E.R. Loubenets in Section 5 and Section 6 was performed at the National Research University Higher School of Economics. The study by Min Namkung in Section 4.2, Section 5 and Section 6 was performed until August 2021 at the National Research University Higher School of Economics and, from September 2021, at the Kyung Hee University under the support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant (NRF2020M3E4A1080088) funded by the Korea government (Ministry of Science and ICT).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Loubenets, E.R., Namkung, M. Conclusive Discrimination by \(N\) Sequential Receivers between \(r\geq2\) Arbitrary Quantum States. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 30, 219–238 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061920823020085
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061920823020085